Nortel Buzzboard

The official Nortel news blog

Nortel reports financial results for Q4 and full year 2007

As you’ve probably seen already, earlier today Nortel announced 4Q and full year 2007 financial results.  Media headlines covering our announcement have obviously focused on two main items - the $1.1B non-cash charge we took against our Canadian Deferred Tax Asset, and the announcement of further restructuring that includes a 2,100 net reduction in employees. But behind those headlines are indications that the underlying fundamentals of Nortel’s operations are trending up:

  • 2007 revenues were up 2% YoY when you account for the divestiture of the UMTS business that happened at the end of 2006.
  • Nortel has now shown six consecutive quarters of strong year over year improvement in operating margin.  OM is now at the highest levels for the company since 2000, with further improvements expected in 2008.
  • Cash flow was positive for 4Q.

There were several articles today that I thought provided good, detailed coverage of our news and Mike Z’s comments in this morning’s conference call, including these articles from the Canadian Press, CRN, and Reuters.

One area where I’ve heard several questions was around what exactly the $1.1B non-cash charge is.  Here’s a quick explanation…

  • Nortel recorded a non-cash charge of US$1.1 billion to adjust the total value of the Company’s Canadian Deferred Tax Assets.
  • Deferred tax assets at their simplest level are tax benefits that can reduce a company’s future taxes, and they can carry forward from quarter to quarter.
  • Every quarter, for accounting purposes, companies routinely assesses accumulated deferred tax assets and makes adjustments in value as required by accounting rules.
  • Nortel’s write-down reflects changes during 2007 such as: decreases in Canada’s corporate tax rate from 19 percent to 15 percent, increases in the value of the Canadian dollar by 18 percent compared to U.S. currency from 2006 through to the end of 2007, and other expectations related to the timing of Nortel’s Canadian taxable income.

The key point here is that this is a non-cash charge and has no bearing on Nortel’s financial fundamentals or cash position, or our ability to deliver next-gen solutions for our customers.  In fact, Nortel has multiple wins in 4Q for advanced technologies, such as with Verizon for both a 40 gig optical network and an LTE 4G wireless trial, and AT&T deploying Nortel IP products for the core of their wireless network.

Comments

  1. wow

  2. So educate us engineers. By writing down the tax credit, you are basically saying that Nortel will not make enough money to use them in 2008 (or have not made enough money to use them in 2007)? If that is the case, Nortel is telegraphing to the world that it will not make as much money as many analysts expected. So if it becomes apparent to most analysts (more than before Q4 announcement) that Nortel will not generate the revenue they expected, why shouldn’t investors sell it off?

    Bottom line, all it sounds like is Nortel will not be doing as well as all the PR hype that has been spun for the last 2+ years. If I am wrong, please correct me in words that we stupid engineers can understand. Death by 1000 cuts is still death.

  3. Me go wow, too, especially considering Nortel has been betting the farm that LTE rival Wimax will emerge as tech of choice.

  4. Good work, give yourselves 20% raises.

  5. Their largest asset appearing on books they are supposedly trying to clean (and SEC is now monitoring repair after Dunn et. al. fraud charges) was an expiring tax credit. Use it or lose it …they lost it …had to be removed from books… simple, no? …heh heh… why you laugh, wait there is more…

    Note that this $1B tax credit was only part of the whopping $4 where there still remains another $3 billion! k?

    now shhhh about the pay raise cracks before some one grabs your face and cuts more benefits =)

    Also, leapfrogging 3G clients to 4G gives them what pool of customers to sell into, anyone? Exactly, no pool! They sold their UMTS, and it is 3G selling now not the 4G buzzword if and when it ever takes off…even Sprint mooned their Wimax.

    Lastly, CDMA is taking a major hit this year that accounts for 80 to 90% of their EBT

    Can we says yikes? Sure we can. Lets, group hug! Now, I also question how they can say 20 dollars was a stock buying opportunity when they just reiterated a year of cash left recently like Owens said before printing $2B bonds downplaying their largest pension deficit in application, $2 B dilutive notes, getting Flex money for dropping century reknown manufacturing, fireselling headquarters, money from UMTS to merged ALA+LU, etc… like just how fast are these guys burning money given they went from 4B in 2004 to under 2B in Q206…

    scarey… a yesteryear darling destined to be gone tomorrow as Chambers would say…

  6. hey, PR guy. Don’t you know that part of the whole “social marketing” process is for you to respond to comments and engage in an ongoing dialog with people reading your blog? It’s more than slapping up posts every few days. The individuals reading & reacting to this blog are watching Nortel more closely than most of the population. They have strong opinions that they will broadcast to others online and off. It would behoove you to turn their negativity into something more constructive and helpful to the Nortel brand.

  7. Thanks for the keen advice fermata. I assume the “PR Guy” comment implies that my years working with Nortel’s product teams to create the news, then interacting directly with the media to communicate the news, somehow disqualifies me from being an effective host for Nortel’s News Blog because I can’t understand the brave new world of “social marketing”. I’d suggest good content and quality interaction are good rules of thumb for any marketing channel. BTW, going from “PR Guy” to “Blogger”, not sure that improves the general perception of me much does it?

  8. That depends on whether you’re made into an official quirky “Own It!” tale

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/corp/ownit/tales

  9. In light of the announced results, there seems be a strong consistent negative reaction to the raises given to Zafirovsky and Hackney. Given that earnings missed expectations (even taking into account the tax item) and morale is surely at an all time low, what criteria is being used to justify these compensation increases? Also, I remember previous cabinet members giving back their bonuses when it came to light that they weren’t deserved. Does the current regime have the same level of integrity? I bet not, but I’d love to be proved wrong.

  10. no, my point was simply that it would enhance your blog if you were an active participant in the discussion that your postings spawn. We haven’t seen any counterpoint to the rampant criticism and negativity here.

  11. Point taken fermata. You’ll see more frequent blogging and commenting from me very soon, as I’m still in the process of getting rid of my old “real job” responsibilities.

    But to your point, I’ll reply to comment #9 from “Another Nortel Watcher”….

    There is a clear distinction between our 4Q07 results and the past accounting situations at Nortel. With the old regime, bonuses were paid out for hitting goals achieved through what turned out to be improper accounting. And the execs later voluntarily paid back their related bonuses (an unprecedented move in corporate America I would suggest).

    While you can argue what an “appropriate” exec compensation is at Nortel (and almost every other F500 company), I think it’s obvious that setting a high ethical standard is of top importance to Z and his cabinet.

  12. Bo, I appreciate your response but I respectfully disagree with parts of it. While it is true that there is a huge difference between 4Q07 results and the past accounting scandal, the point they share in common is that performance-oriented compensation rewards are not justified. So unless someone can shed some light on the justification for these large raises, I completely disagree that high ethical standard is of top importance to MZ or his cabinet. The evidence suggests the opposite. Hackney was not fired for his unacceptable attack on a young women - in fact he was promoted. Taking such a large raise after a year in which the shareholders have lost more than 2/3 of their investment, a couple of thousand employees lost their livelihood, and another 2100 have been earmarked to go is NOT what I consider ethical behavior. Not even close.

  13. thanks, Bo. I see you are picking up the pace and appreciate it.

  14. Bo,

    Thank you. I appreciate you efforts with regard to this blog.

    I just could not let the “……..high ethical standard is of top importance to Z and his cabinet” statement go… :)

    1) As Zafirovski came to nortel he violated his written agreement with Motorola, AND got nortel to bail him out to the tune of 12 Million.

    2) A Sr. Executive was *convicted* of physical assault an intimidation and was not fired.

    3) Nortel’s ethics officer quit (was fired?) over her discomfort with Zafirovski’s selective ethical enforcement policies above.

    4) Aforementioned Sr. Executive was *promoted* replacing someone that was producing,. The results have been less than stellar.

    5) Zafirovski now rewards himself and his “team” for what can only be portrayed as a financial “miss”.

    Please tell me about “ethics” at nortel again?

    BTW. While I like your blog, shouldn’t there be a link that can be gotten to from the main page?

  15. We’re working on getting a link to this blog higher up in the nortel.com structure. Right now, if you go to the main Nortel news page you can see a link from there.

  16. Many - Impressive articulation of the issue. Nice job.

    Bo - I don’t expect an ‘answer’ to the issues raised because I think the ‘answer’ is that the emperor has no clothes and it would be awkward for you to take that position. However, if you have any opinions on the issue I’d sure like to hear them.

  17. Nortel Watcher- I agree with you, however in fairness to Bo I don’t think it would be appropriate to assume that he can shed some light on what amounts to a controversial pay raise for both Zafirovski and Hackney.

    This new blog is at least a welcome addition and also an opportunity for a variety of people to share their concerns and opinions regarding everything from Nortel’s near and longterm strategies, however with respect to Nortel’s commitment to the “highest level of ethics and standards” it does somewhat leave a bitter taste in invevstors mouths when already well compensated execs are enjoying 20 percent pay raises on top of disproportionate salaries relative to the overall performance of Nortel’s financial health and its stock price.

    It’s not that we as investors expect or want to put top execs in the hot seat concerning their financial compensation as I’m sure that Cisco CEO John Chambers is awarded more than Nortel’s CEO,however at least Cisco investors don’t have a 75 percent fallen shareprice as ammunition to complain about their CEO’s pay package.

    Onc again I welcome the addition of Bo’s blog but it I feel it would go a long way if Nortel indsiders can be a little more transparent with respect to investor’s concerns considering that Nortel is currently facing many challenges and is by no means out of the woods relative to its positioning within the industry.

    A nice vote of confidence would be to see Nortel insiders buying shares of their own company at a time when it is at or near its all time low and not just see shares awarded as grants.

    As they say- actions speak louder than words!

    Bill

    a concerned investor

  18. Bill,

    Chambers is highly compensated. However, he does make at least a positive gesture to the employess and shareholders when times are tough.
    http://www.news.com/Cisco-CEO-draws-1-salary/2100-1033_3-960745.html

Leave a Reply