John Roese’s Blog CTO, Nortel

Rebuilding the Nortel Brand

Location: Ottawa, Canada

Over the last six months, I’ve been talking primarily about our technology vision and strategy for rebuilding Nortel into the great company it has historically been. A complementary effort to that is making sure we get our story out. So, I thought it might be interesting for you to hear from my colleague Lauren Flaherty, Nortel’s Chief Marketing Officer, who’s been working aggressively to rebuild Nortel’s brand.

I’ll be posting my next entry this coming Wednesday.

lauren.jpg
Lauren Flaherty

There's been lots of enthusiastic discussion on this blog and others about what Nortel should be doing and recently some of it has concerned marketing specifically, so John invited me to jump into the dialogue and share some views of my own.

Nortel, like any company who has faced challenges, is a lightning rod for commentary and naysayers. But if you take a moment to consider the not-so-distant past you'll see we have some pretty terrific icons who have been down the same path … Apple, HP and IBM (where I worked in marketing for 25 years through highs and lows), to name a few.

And like them, we're not only working on strengthening all our business fundamentals, we're also working like mad to rebuild Nortel's image and make the brand a powerful tool for driving revenue growth. Our work in this area goes well beyond a "snappy marketing slogan" but I will take that description as a compliment because breaking through the noise these days is half the challenge. Consider this: the typical professional adult in North America receives over 650 advertising messages per day!

Most of the blog entries on this site zoom in on the technology debate (and that's great). But I'd like to detour that dialogue and share some thoughts about what it takes to create real market pull and a strong brand in today's market.

Like most professions, marketing suffers trends so let's talk about what's "out". Volume is out. Today is about delivering a relevant message with precision; in fact, dishing out more of what's not welcome to begin with is a negative, not a positive, and marketplace reaction can be punishing. Chest-pounding is out. Today's customers are the smartest any marketer has ever tried to connect with. Claims without strong customer advocacy behind them are becoming increasingly hollow; today's buyers have access to independent, detailed analysis 24/7. That's a good thing; it keeps us all on our toes. Lastly, corporate branding is out. You used to be able to build your reputation and shape perceptions through corporate image television and print advertising. Not anymore. The traditional tools of building brands, especially for BtoB companies, are quickly becoming passé. Today, be prepared to engage and demonstrate your wares and then let your advocates (customers most importantly) do the talking. Check out this piece on Forbes.com. It underscores how the conventional wisdom about brands and how to build them is changing.

So, how is all of this influencing what we're doing at Nortel? Based on what we know about how people feel about Nortel we are foremost concerned about reconnecting with customers and potential customers. Not with some massive air assault but through deep, local engagement. We are cherry-picking select metropolitan markets (a few examples are below) that are key to our growth worldwide and we are reintroducing and educating those markets about who we are and how we can help them. The strategy is centered around an execution model that is built on weaving our sellers, channel partners, the media, and our customers together to build advocacy for the brand.

The anthem, or campaign theme, we use is "Hyperconnectivity". Why did we select it? Two reasons: first, because we found it hit a powerful chord across our key targets; second, because it helped our brand promise of Business Made Simple resonate in a more meaningful manner. All of us are beginning to see the impact of a society that is becoming hyperconnected. At MIT a few weeks back, we were with the team who leads the MIT Media Lab and talking about what happens when over 1 trillion devices are connected to the network. It's mind-blowing. But for businesses (Carrier and Enterprise), this era of hyperconnectivity poses both staggering challenges and breathtaking opportunities. Putting Nortel in the center of this dialogue is critical. It helps make us relevant again. It helps people see us as a player in the future of the communications industry, which is exactly what we want. Most importantly, this vision, coupled with the technology and capabilities we can deliver, will genuinely help our customers achieve the possible..

Do we have it all right yet? Not by a long shot, but we've made great progress quickly and we're fine-tuning constantly, as we should. Perhaps what I find most encouraging is that there are a lot of people out there who would like to see Nortel back at its fighting weight. The marketplace loves competition and we're just fine about the fact that we have to play like a challenger.

billboard.jpg

Chicago: Wacker Drive & Lake Street

escalator.jpg

London Underground

Trackbacks/Pings

  1. […] First off, thanks to the GaZiLlion Nortel employees who read our Ad Campaign post yesterday - it seems like it’s making the viral rounds at company.  What prompted the post - other than that wonderful “unfortunate ad placement”, was the fact that the marketing machine at Nortel often missed the mark.  Campaigns like “Business without Boundaries” undermines the value of the products, and focusses attention on the negative aspects of the business.  I just caught up with Nortel CTO John Roese’s blog, it seems that the company’s Chief Marketing Officer feels the same way.  In a guest post, Lauren Flaherty writes Do we have it all right yet? Not by a long shot, but we’ve made great progress quickly and we’re fine-tuning constantly, as we should. Perhaps what I find most encouraging is that there are a lot of people out there who would like to see Nortel back at its fighting weight. […]

Comments

  1. Hi John,

    Indeed, rebuilding a big name is a challenging initiative which requires not only the passion and effort of the executive staff, but more the contribution of every single “cell” from company’s body to ensure the metamorphose. Rebuilding is something the company needs, to survive…But let me ask You some sharp questions…After transformation,considering that this will succeed w/o creating any additional handicaps, what will the company be ready to offer? What if the other players on the same field will decide to move on in a different direction than what Nortel wishes? Let me get back to biology …How many outstanding cells has the company lost in the past years, maybe in the favor of competition or customers (which could in this context quite easily become “former customers”) ? And how many poisoned cells (targeting here the managers and decision makers) are still in there? Here the executive staff should know the answer.
    Thanks for the blog initiative and hope to hear from You soon.

    Augustin

  2. John / Lauren - it all sounds good but as an investor I still don’t have enough on which to evaluate a Nortel buy decision. I read the vision/strategy as outlined by George, I read the Marketing perspective as outlined here by Lauren, I read the numerous technical pieces that John has written, and I chuckled when I read Mike Pangia’s piece which mostly pointed to John Roth and Frank Dunn initiatives as evidence of Nortel’s strength in China. All just words until we see an execution plan.

    If Nortel can get it’s act together and focus on delivering some credible growth programs (which are still mostly a mystery), then the stock is significantly under-valued and it’s a big investment opportunity, maybe the next Apple or HP. Nortel has a lot of hard and soft assets that can be leveraged once there is a clear path forward. On the other hand, if Nortel doesn’t have the ability to develop and execute on a roadmap that complements the strategy and the silos continue to run in business-as-usual mode, then the stock is significantly over-priced and will experience increasing erosion as efficiency and cost-reduction opportunities dry up. The default scenario and the appearance in the market is the latter, not the former. What’s it going to be?

  3. It is quite amusing to observe the following:

    Lauren F states that:

    “Volume is out. Today is about delivering a relevant message with precision; in fact, dishing out more of what’s not welcome to begin with is a negative, not a positive, and marketplace reaction can be punishing.”

    Yet we see as an example an escalator in London with no fewer than 21+ posters in a row with messages like “Who wants to ping pong all day long”. I find this to be neither relevant nor precise, and especially not appropriate if “volume is out”.

    In contrast, recall the year old campaign for HSBSC in several international airports that featured different meaning of the same symbol in differnt cultures. Sparing, well placed, and spot on: local expert help is needed.

    As with all Nortel messaging of late, once again the talk and the walk are miles apart. Maybe it’s time for another “right angle turn”

  4. I have an interesting story to recount: As a Marketing Professional, I’ve been intrigued by the Hyperconnectivity campaign since it was launched.

    Last Saturday evening, i was out to dinner with some friends and the subject came up. At one point i asked, “who is Nortel’s main competition?” One of my more tech savvy friends replied, “Cisco.” Later I went and checked out what Cisco is doing with marketing today and saw their “Human Network” approach… the difference struck me strongly: this Hyperconnectivity campaign removes people [or at best treats them as ‘nodes’ in the network] and has a very daunting look to it: jumbles of wires, crowded cities, complexities and confusing words. Its intimidating to me.

    To use a hyper-modern mythological metaphor, from the outside it reads like Cisco is the rebel alliance led by Luke and Han and Leia that cares about people and Nortel is the evil empire that’s calling its big complicated death star of a network the future and saying we all have to “live with it.”

  5. In my opinion, Hyperconnectivity is indeed a reflection of present and future realities. I dont think it discounts the human network, rather I think it is very correct in depicting a mish-mash of exponential interfaces between people (i.e. the human element) and devices that people use. Furthermore, as you traverse into the upcoming virtual worlds such as those presented by second life and their immenent real world interfaces, the paradigmn of connectivity becomes exceedingly esoteric. Look down a few years into the future, and you can probably fathom that network addressability for devices is only going to grow exponentially. Perhaps we need, if it does not already exist, an equivalent of Moore’s law that is tailored to indicate exponential growth in network interfaces. So in short, for me, Hyperconnectivity is a reality and it includes the human network at its heart. Therefore I do not agree with Colton’s StarWars analogy :-)

  6. Just thought I would jump in here on the subject of the London Underground escalator advertising as I am the marketing leader for EMEA Region (with the London “Tornado” within my territory) and give a little insight into what we’re doing…

    The picture in the Blog is of the Digital Escalator Panels. We only actually have either 8 or 9 panels in any given sequence.
    They all change every 5 seconds, so the message develops as you get carried past on the tube station escalators.

    The focus in and around London HAS to be exceedingly precise (it’s a huge city after all) and I won’t go into the sheer depth of information we now have available to us (through some new tools we have invested in), but it now means that we can be VERY precise in building these so-called “media tunnels” for our target decision makers.

    These Digital Escalator Panels are only placed in tube station locations with the highest levels of target customer site densities in the immediately surrounding streets. The selected 5 tube stations will see somewhere between 52,000 people (Charing Cross) to 170,000 people (Tottenham Court Road) every week.

    Significantly, this is exactly where the vast majority of our target decision makers pass through every single day. It’s all part of the air-cover you absolutely must have in place for other targeted 1:1 marketing and selling activity to take place; it provides
    the correct environmental backdrop.

    There is a whole raft of other marketing and sales activities that fit into the exact same precise methodology for the London Tornado campaign. I can’t begin to go into the detail here, but suffice it say it’s highly personalised, intense (without being intrusive) and extremely targeted. AND… The consequence of this precision is that, unless you are on our target list, you simply won’t see it.

    On the subject of the messaging; be assured that we have completed extensive message-testing with real decision makers from the target group. The feedback from them has been very strong and positive. As ever, it’s not about what we (in Nortel)like, it’s what works in the mind of our targets and sometimes… what works may genuinely surprise you!

  7. I am in agreement that the message needs to be more “human”. That said, I also find the Cisco ads annoying. It could be the sweet, young, cloying, artificial voice over, or the idea of being dragged and dropped by someone, but the Cisco ads are abrasive.

    It is not just about the exponential number of connections, but also the ability to usefully interpret data from many more sources. I thought Microsoft’s “one degree of separation” ads were far better than either “hyperconnectivity” or the “human network”. They really showed fanciful applications that were useful. Nortel’s adds are 1) too cold and 2) too ethereal.

    Cisco and Avaya are Nortel’s main competitor in the enterprise, but Nortel is also competitive in the communications service provider market (actually more so than in the enterprise). Which market is being targeted with “hyperconnectivity”? To the casual observer, it is not clear but I surmise it is targeted at enterprise.

    The question then is; who makes the purchasing decision in enterprise? The answer; usually the finance folks with input from the technical and operations folks. So, you are best framing your ads in those contexts. How does hyperconnectivity solve (in a human sense) the problems of finance? of operations? of IT?

  8. The famous John Kotter’s change model is highly applicable in the hyperconnectivity brand change. Do we have the parameters on which to measure the success of hyperconnectivity? The 6th step in the model is “Create short term wins”. To keep the strong efforts going on, this is necessary. We have to measure the outcome of what we spend and base short term wins on that. This piece of information has evaded me totally.

  9. Hmmm…I think I like Many’s suggestion of showing fanciful applications that would fall in the realm of hyperconnectivity. I would like such ads, especially if it shows a mix of current and some futuristic applications being entangled in the realm of hyperconnectivity, and yet being managed seamlessly and easily via solutions targeting challenges posed by hyperconnectivity.

  10. Um yeah, I hear Lauren, I like see Nortel duking it out with Cisco in the Enterprise space… From a Cisco standpoint I have been seeing many of my customers looking away from them and looking at alternatives (I am a consultant) and well here is a good thread to read if you dont believe me… Cisco: The end of a religion?
    http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/15375#comment-65370

  11. I like the Hyperconnectivity campaign. I think for once Nortel can speak to its strengths. I’ve not been so happy about preevious campaigns that were easy to riducule and that undermined the products.

    The one downside though is this “unfortunate ad placement”… http://sensorymetrics.com/2007/07/23/new-nortel-ad-campaign-it-is-just-da-bomb/

    But then, unfortunate ad placements happen to the best of them!

  12. Personally I do not like the hyperconnectivity campaign. In stark contrast to Cisco’s very warm human focussed campaign Nortel’s seems to present some threatening dehumanized distopia as the future. Did someone working on the campaign also work on the matrix? In contrast to being really “simple” there are banners of “simplicity trumps complexity. hyperconnectivity.com”. Trumps? What’s wrong with ‘beats’. Two four syllable words, and an invented seven syllable mashup presented on a complex background. That isn’t simple at all - it’s a mouthful. Although I understand the principles behind what is being said, I don’t like the implementation.

  13. Unfortunate ad placement? There is the understatement of the year. People discussing the add would likely get thrown off the plane!

    I just want to know if it is before or after the TSA stop? Perhaps right over their heads?

  14. BTW, I wanted to also mention that the “Human Element” ads by Dow are what I consider to be very good ads in the abstract. Better than any by Cisco or Microsoft. They are not aimed directly at customers, but they convey a new way to look at Dow products beyond just chemistry and in that sense, I think they are extremely effective.

  15. How does the Nortel BCM compare with Cisco Telephony?? I have a customer that has a 0×32 and wants to upgrade

Leave a Reply