John Roese’s Blog CTO, Nortel

Innovation is Alive and Well at Nortel

Location: Barcelona, Spain

It’s been a crazy few weeks for me but, finally, I have some time to catch up on a few blog items. Sitting here in Barcelona after flying over night from Ottawa via Heathrow, I was reflecting on the Nortel Patent Awards Gala we held in Ottawa Friday night. These awards recognized Nortel employees from Ottawa (our largest R&D center, with 5000 employees) and other nearby Nortel R&D sites (e.g., Boston, Belleville, and Montreal) for recently granted or filed patents. (We will be doing similar events in London and Dallas over the next month.)

Now, in general, this is a pretty internal event so dialog related to it on my external blog might not be of interest to everyone, but what struck me as Mike Z and I stood on stage for what seemed like hours recognizing our inventors was not only the sheer volume of innovations that this company continues to produce, but more importantly, the fact that the R&D community continues to seek out the “white spaces” and new areas that will ultimately be the future of telecom.

To reflect on the relevance of innovation to Nortel’s long-term strategy, let me recap a brief talk I did Friday night.

If we look at Nortel’s past, the biggest inflections the company is associated with were the shift from analog to digital telephony, the transition from copper to fiber, the acceleration of wireless networking, and the move to IP-based services. While we were not the only player in these industry transformations, it is reasonable to assert that we were either the significant or a key player in each.

The DMS family of switching systems (foundational to Digital World) was a radical departure from traditional telephony architecture and, while high risk for Nortel at the time, ultimately transformed the PSTN. Our FiberWorld initiative in the late 1980s was driven by our innovation in SONET technology, and with the increased capacity for core transport from that technology much of the modern Internet was accelerated. In cellular and wireless, Nortel was not initially a player but with our joint venture with Matra Cellular, we entered a market that today we have significant presence in (for example, about 25% of the worldwide CDMA market). And, finally, the shift to IP-based systems was not lost on Nortel. We were one of the first telephony companies to support IP as a core transport and, today, continue to be number one in terms of market share for carrier VoIP (at 15%) and number two for IP Business Telephony Lines (at 16%), according to Q2 07 reports from Dell'Oro.

Behind every one of these inflections were large IPR positions that enabled us to shape the market and defend our technology innovation.

If we look at the current strategy, we see a similar model. Today, we are focused on fourth-generation (4G) wireless systems, on next-generation wireline transport, and on Unified Communications technologies. If we look behind these spaces, we also see huge IPR positions and enormous innovation from the Nortel R&D community.

Many consider us a leader in MIMO technology and our breadth and depth of patents in this space (dating back to the late ‘90s), support that view. MIMO will be key for 4G, and that IPR and innovation, coupled with a wide range of other inventions, make us confident in our technology footing. In the Carrier Ethernet battle, our position that a simplified and de-layered packet-based transport centered on Ethernet is the way to the future is supported by 5+ years of inventions and patents in the space. Finally, in Unified Communications, the current model of embedded telecom functions and network services into the applications experience is something our inventors have been focused on for more than a decade. Last Friday we recognized many inventions in areas such as click-to-connect and presence and location services. This area is particularly exciting for me because a large part of my own patents and filings (back when I had more time to do that kind of work :-) ) were in this space.

I guess the point of this post is to make the statement that if you want to shape the telecom or IT world, you don’t do it on the spur of the moment. Instead, you do it by a consistent focus on continuous innovation and a strategy that takes that innovation into commercial practice. The above examples represent a 40+ year timeframe of this focus at Nortel and my view from Friday night’s event was that this culture of innovation is still very much alive and well at Nortel.

I have included a few pictures from the event that capture the scale of it. Considering this is just one of 3 events we will do to recognize the inventor population at Nortel, even this event by itself does not capture the breadth and depth of our innovation engine.

Hopefully you found this blog entry interesting even though it is not an industry or technology dialog. My next entry will be to catch up on the scale of regulatory activity in the industry and a position that we have more activity going on today in public networks than maybe we can absorb.

roese_zhu_zafirovski.jpg

Photo credit: Mike Pinder Photography

Me and CEO Mike Zafirovski with Peiying Zhu (one of Nortel's most prolific inventors, who was recognized for 4 patents & 21 filings in 2006).

dinner.jpg

Photo credit: Mike Pinder Photography

Dinner in the ballroom.

zafirovski_tong.jpg

Photo credit: Mike Pinder Photography

CEO Mike Zafirovski and Wen Tong (a Nortel Fellow who was recognized for 15 patents and 23 filings in 2006), enjoying the evening entertainment.

zafirovski_graves.jpg

Photo credit: Mike Pinder Photography

Mike Z with Alan Graves, a Nortel Fellow recognized for 9 patents and 8 filings in 2006 (seen hauling away his awards in the purple box). Alan also holds many of the fundamental patents in SONET, the key technology that enabled the industry to transition from copper to fiber transport.

Comments

  1. Thanks John for sharing that with us

    just curious though,what was Mike “waving the white flag” to?lol

  2. John, here I am again. Same basic questions. Nortel’s history, which you liberally reference in this post, is not something I look to for insight. The accomplishments you reference were achieved by a context and a leadership team that you (and your cabinet colleagues) weren’t a part of and that has moved on. The key question is, can the current leadership team live up to the legacy that you reference? Nortel is making a lot of noise about 4G as the next big thing, yet your execution plan and business forecast is still pretty much a mystery to the outside world.

    It’s good to see that Nortel is once again recognizing the real talent base that fuels the company, but once again I feel disappointed because I still can’t point to ‘that plan’ that the company is rallying behind for future growth. Are you going to do anything to capitalize on these inventors achievements or is it all in vain? I think it’s your job to force this stuff into the pipeline. Are you up to the challenge?

  3. cheers,

    innovations should be leveraged to improve the financial performance and hence the stock value of Nortel, when will this be eventually true for Nortel? my stocks have been on a down-ward spiral??????????

  4. Mike,

    The key question is how does Nortel plan to transform itself to a nimble player for the 4G market. Will it be able to create an enduring competitive advantage over the rest of the equipment vendors and continue its innovation in the field. Or will it be another disruptive technology which would Nortel would present to the world but others would reap the benefits of it.

  5. Paul Stevens says he still can’t point to the plan? Nortel has laid out its plan at several presentations and in many cities…it’s really not a mystery. I would point Mr. Stevens to the recent report by the TD Securities analyst…he shows what specific businesses NT is targeting..the revenue numbers (his) and associated profit potential. Who can really blame NT for not spelling out in excrutiating detail every point of its plan…Would that be smart? Mr. Stevens…I have a feeling NT can’t impress you under any circumstances. Why the apparent visceral hate? What can NT’s current management team due to make things better? I’m all for you keeping up your posts beacuse I, as an NT proponent, am trying to get to the bottom of the negativity as it relates to the current NT management.

  6. Mr. Burtschy,

    Perhaps you could paraphrase the report of which you speak? I would love to see specifics. Why wouldn’t nortel publish this revealing report?

    Otherwise, I have to agree with Paul;

    Long on glittering generalities, short on specifics.

    Long on manufacturing style bottom line cuts, short on top line revenue growth

    Long on hype and buzz words, short on vision and definition

    Long on cronyism, short on walking the walk.

  7. Many: Bingo.

  8. John,

    I left a message with Mike and I wrote a letter to the BOD but I am still trying to understand what is going on - can you help?

    As a small investor who btw owns more shares than you I am trying to understand how is it that with all your blogs and talk that your stock price is down 50% and Ciena’s is up 150% in the last two years.

    Your comment would really be appreciated. BTW that would make a really good entry in you blogsite.

    Thanks,

    Nick

  9. I don’t think Paul Stevens shows any “visceral hate”.
    It would be so wonderful to see these inventors leave corporations, create their patents on their own, get together in a small group and really make the big guys wake up and run for their money!

  10. The next generation of innovation is going to be driven by the megatrend of Hyperconnectivity, that you have discussed in your earlier blogs. Hyperconnectivity will be transformational for enterprises. When asked by TMCnet to strat a blog (I already write a monthly column in Internet Telephony magazine), I accepted and chose to call it The Hyperconnected Enterprise, where I will explore what Hyperconnectivity will mean to businesses. It can be found at: http://blog.tmcnet.com/the-hyperconnected-enterprise/

  11. I too think Nortel needs to be more frank:

    I still recall in the telco heyday of the late 90’s good folk leaving Nortel in droves, moving on to what they thought were bigger and better things with countless upstarts and offshoots, as did their numerous CEOs with truckloads of Nortel cash. We all know how that ended.

    Today their campus in, say, Richardson still boasts more than a few good folks who’ve basically been relegated to “walking the mile” for several *years* now, which I find no less scandalous than continuing to throw anywhere from $11 mio to $35 mio around in by today’s standards ather costly attempts make them ornery ole troubles go away.

    Turning off lavatory lights is good discipline, but
    soda machine lights have been turned off, also, or the machines removed altogether.

    I can’t imagine employee ESATs being filled out diligently, much less with positive, optimistic feedback by a group thats shipped most of its labs overseas and has been left to linger in the dark, both literally and figuratively. Is this what now passes as “activity”, or being “pro-active”?

    I’d sell, merge, turn all the lights out for good, do something.

    “The latest speculation suggests Nortel could be interested in Foundry Networks Inc., F5 Networks Inc. and Polycom Inc. (ex-Nortel CEO Bill Owens is a Polycom director).”

    Stockholders are sure to be agog.

  12. Continually prodding for specifics of the company’s future game plan for growth is not likely to be very fruitful here in a CTO blog forum. Nor is routinely mulling over the past going to provide anything more than white noise because it has been done sooooo many times before.

    If we stop to listen though, John makes some great points here which no one seems to really grasp in my opinion: the path to the future of this company is founded in these tremendous innovations being delivered to the market. This company was founded on innovation and technology, and this is where their strength remains today across wireless, WLAN, switching, routing, voice, and transport. Although I am not currently a stockholder, I do feel confident that with the recent restructurings, partnerships (MSFT/LG/etc), product announcements, and company wide-operational improvements, that the time to reinvest is coming sooner rather than later.

    It’s amazing to me that so many people today look for the future to spelled out in simple stesp like “here comes the next iPhone” in order to get excited about momentum and business. Nortel is not in the iPhone/consumer business, nor are they competing exclusively against Ceina as erroneously indicated above. This is a company working in a very broad market who has admittedly had to work diligently to throw some baggage from the train in recent years, and building sustainable momentum does not happen overnight.
    However, the steam from the smokestacks is beginning to billow according to the recent announcements, partnerships, and of course the recognizable trend 10K improvements across the board.

    While I realize that we have not yet quite reached the top of the hill on this journey, I would like to offer many thanks to John, Zman, George, Joel and Richard for delivering on the commitment to make this a long-term successful model; versus delivering us another short-term sprint to flash-in-the-pan profitability that so many continue to look for in today’s market.

    KC

  13. KC, you seem to be suggesting that people should accept with blind faith that the five people mentioned will lead Nortel to long term prosperity. Why would they? None of the five people mentioned has a track record in Nortel’s businesses and the stock has not done well under their collective tenure so far, so it is natural for people to want some insight into what might turn things around. This doesn’t seem to be a problem for Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, etc..

Leave a Reply