John Roese’s Blog CTO, Nortel

The Unwired Enterprise

Location: On vacation

In the last few weeks, Nortel has received a reasonable amount of press about our announcement of the Unwired Enterprise initiative. In this announcement, we identified a timeframe on one of the biggest outstanding questions in the Enterprise landscape: “When will wireless technology be sufficient to eliminate the need to wire new buildings and facilities for LAN access?”

The challenge with this question is that the answer is pretty subjective. Five or more years ago, many enterprises began using Wi-Fi as a primary access network in branch offices and remote sites but to this date most, if not all, still fully wire new buildings for wireline access in large sites and campuses. The main reason is that while 802.11 wireless technology is a pretty good technology, it has had to mature to catch up to the security, stability, simplicity and performance expectations of wired Ethernet.

It is our position that, after a decade of evolution, both Wi-Fi and broadband wireless (4G) technologies are getting close enough to the expectations of the customer that we are becoming able to build the Unwired Enterprise from an access perspective.

In security, the wireless security models built around 802.1X, WPA2 and other security standards are actually significantly more robust than those of almost any wireline network. Strong, flexible two-factor authentication and authorization, along with robust protection mechanisms, make a well-implemented wireless network secure enough to meet the expectations of most enterprises for almost any use. Unfortunately, the security model applies only if the end systems support these methods and, as we all know, in the hyperconnected era, the diversity of end points means that additional technologies to support clientless and passive end-point security are still evolving.

In stability, the wireless networks that are emerging around 802.11n are getting pretty good. They have path diversity with OFDM-MIMO, and the adaptability of most Wi-Fi systems allows for overlapping coverage and some basic interference avoidance. Here, we believe there is still work to be done, but much of that work is deriving advanced technology from the carrier wireless world and making the kind of adaptive, advanced RF systems that are expected from cellular networks possible in the enterprise. One of the key focus areas of the Unwired Enterprise effort is this derivation of technology from the carrier wireless world into the enterprise to enhance its resiliency and scale.

In simplicity, again, great progress in making the wireless enterprise easier to operate, but the fact that Wi-Fi is still an overlay and not embedded into a common network creates unneeded complexity. The vision of the Unwired Enterprise is to compress wired and wireless physical access technologies into a common set of networking systems. Embedding the control functions of the wireless system into the switching infrastructure enables a common control plane, fewer components, and an ability to operate the network as a common system from a management and security perspective. To date, there are few embedded wireless systems and even those do not truly unify the overall system design. Clearly, if we are to drive the possible simplicity of this system, a full integration is needed.

In performance, the 802.11n standard is quite good. Using OFDM-MIMO, it allows for very high performance levels when compared to prior systems such as 802.11a,g,b. The challenge with 802.11n is that, as a classic Wi-Fi technology, the implementation is usually simplistic in that the system is designed for optimal coverage and then lacks an ability to adapt as the environment changes. What is understood in the cellular space, on the other hand, is that the environment is quite complex and requires systems to adapt to that diversity and complexity to maintain a predictable coverage and performance model. The Unwired Enterprise needs the adaptability of the cellular systems’ RF experience but at enterprise economics.

As you can see from the above, the Unwired Enterprise is almost upon us, but it will need a focus and expertise from the carrier wireless world to finally achieve reality. Because of the expertise Nortel has in this area, we are taking a pretty bold stance and have now told the enterprise market that we are focused on closing these final gaps. When that is done, the enterprise CIO will, for the first time, have a legitimate choice about how to provide primary access connections pervasively. The options will include: traditional wired; wired with wireless options; and now, for the first time, wireless only.

This is great for mobility and productivity from a customer view, but it is also an inflection point that can force a re-thinking of the enterprise LAN architecture. That is something that happens very rarely but, when it does, the market can be remade and the vendor landscape can be transformed. This is consistent with our overall posture of transforming the enterprise.

Trackbacks/Pings

  1. […] John Roese, Nortel’s CTO, has a nice post on why he thinks we are almost at the point where enterprise network infrastructure can go wireless only. He’s careful not to say we’re exactly there now, but certainly sees Nortel as a leader in this space. He writes: It is our position that, after a decade of evolution, both Wi-Fi and broadband wireless (4G) technologies are getting close enough to the expectations of the customer that we are becoming able to build the Unwired Enterprise from an access perspective. […]

Comments

  1. John,

    Have you ever seen the Gartner “Hype Cycle”?

    It is simplistic and in certain ways downright funny, but for me, it does have value in that it accurately describes a lot of technology and Gartner’s view of the relationships between technologies on a continuum.

    I would say that the “Unwired Enterprise” is still early on “The Slope Of Enlightenment”. Why? because the tools and metrics are not there to accurately isolate problems and manage the network, which is (I think) what you are alluding to when you say “What is understood in the cellular space, on the other hand, is that the environment is quite complex and requires systems to adapt to that diversity and complexity to maintain a predictable coverage and performance model……….”

    What I do not understand about your entry is that this statement seemingly contradicts the paragraph above which talks about simplicity.

    I understand that an integrated design would probably appear to be simpler, however the problem has an essential complexity that is above and beyond a wired implementation, don’t you agree?

  2. The challenge is designing the systems in such a way as to abstract the underlying complexity from the users. While the systems themselves may be extremely complex, you need to build them to be intelligent and adaptive so that they are able to manage the complexity themselves.

  3. Kelly,

    I agree.

    It seems to me that a company must have basic design philosophies that can greatly assist in the success of abstracting the complexity. One of these philosophies (I believe) should be “data in the absence of an actor is benign”. Unfortunately I see many standards and implementations with the philosophy “if I don’t understand the data, then treat it as an exception”. This leads dropped calls/sessions, end user frustration and added complexity as people deploying systems have to work much harder to satisfy users who try to adapt a constrained set of services to meet their needs.

    I think there are other simple well understood design heuristics that can abstract the complexity and makes systems easier to adapt. The problem is building these into standards and design methodologies.

    Too many companies forget we are in the business of processing sessions not tearing them down.

  4. The Unwired Enterprise will become a reality, there is no doubt here. What I cannot agree with John is the ‘cellular space” required to achieve the predictable performance. What’s about the “cellular space” in 5G?

  5. The “Unwired Enterprise” indeed. Kind of like all new technology, the “Undiscovered Country.”

    The problem is not going to be development of technology that can perform but to develop management tools (which always lag behind) to manage the wireless network of devices and the users\devices on that network. John knows this from a former life. He is just getting started - you still weave a good story John!

    Regards,

    Mike Hawkins

  6. It sounds like a great idea. However my concern has not always been building or managing a wireless data network, but putting in place a wireless power network. Network devices, PCs, users require power to operate. How to get the devices to run on long term power in an unwired network, without the husstle to recharge batteries or the panic to lose your data is the challenge. To me that’s where we need to focus on more.
    regards
    Henry Obare

  7. Henry,

    Right you are. That is something the folks can’t seem to get through their heads wrt SIP. Too many messages will tether the wireless phone to a wall socket.

Leave a Reply